I recently had an apartment for rent and was approached by The Connections. It's a housing agency that replaces people into housing. I've dealt with them in the past and have had success so I wasn't worried when they referred this woman to me. She seemed very nice. She had a 1 year old daughter who was very well behaved. I rented her the apartment after doing my usual prior eviction checks, criminal checks, etc. I did my homework as I do with all of my units. 30 days into her lease I get a complaint from the condo association that said she was overdosed and running and screaming in the hallways and banging on everyone's door. That night she was taken to the hospital over dosed on fentanyl and her child was appropriately place in foster care.

Upon learning that she had over dosed the Connections in Middletown informed me that they would pay through the eviction as well as find her housing to get her help and out of there. Two days later they discharged her from the program and left me holding the bag in now having to evict her, which is not going to be easy because although I can get her out for noise complaints it is not easy nor quick. I feel this agency knowingly gave me a tenant on drugs. Didn't tell me this was her background and then left me holding the bag. It is going to cost me thousands to evict, lost rent, not to mention the apartment was recently renovated and I shutter to think of what the unit will look like after this woman and her drugged out friends will leave the place looking like. I understand that illegal drug activity is grounds to be discontinued from a state or federal program like Section 8 however if there have been no arrests or convictions it because a he said she said deal. Which leads me to believe that they are indeed responsible for at least paying the rent until such time as she is out of the unit. Anyone ever experience anything like this? Much appreciated.

New Haven, Connecticut

1 Vote

3 Replies

Jump to Last Reply

Sort By:

Oldest

498
Posts: 388
Votes

Samuel Eddinger

Meriden, CT

Samuel Eddinger

Meriden, CT

Replied August 28, 2023 06:00

@Sylvia H. - We have had luck with some of the agencies and bad luck with others. It really is agency specific. You got unlucky in this case as people that need help sometimes are not willing to continue to utilize the support they are offered.

In general, I screen tenants with agencies like with any other tenant. If the applicant has a long criminal record, I reject even if they do have support from an agency.

I've had luck with shelter plus care and the connections in the past (I have one connections currently that transferred to Section 8). I've had mixed bag with IRIS.

I'd be happy to talk about this further but just like with Section 8, if a tenant stops paying or needs to be evicted, it is on us (the housing provider) to get them out. Frequently, they will even keep their voucher (which is crazy). DM if you would like to discuss this further.

0 Votes

141
Posts: 61
Votes

Sylvia H.Poster

Replied December 04, 2023 15:13

Quote from @Samuel Eddinger:

In general, I screen tenants with agencies like with any other tenant. If the applicant has a long criminal record, I reject even if they do have support from an agency.

I've had luck with shelter plus care and the connections in the past (I have one connections currently that transferred to Section 8). I've had mixed bag with IRIS.

Sam thank you so much for your wise advice. My apologies for responding so late. I haven't been online and only saw this today. I will definitely reach out to you. We landlords have to stick together. Thanks for the advice

1 Vote

Baselane