Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply
I maybe just lost 30k
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8619/e8619a180a55765bd7dbd8712e16992d3b6a3b31" alt="Michael Lucero's profile image"
Well with the first option you're not really losing any hard/real money upfront, it's only on paper. Yes, you may not have equity (which is something you obviously should always strive to have in a purchase), but you also don't have to pay 20k or whatever in taxes, so you're only out 10k. Furthermore, if the fourplex cash flows, it may not be that bad of a route to take. The only thing that sucks about buying possibly above market is that RE has been so hot lately it would be hard to see big appreciation upside to make up that assumed 30k gap. On the other hand, if you don't take the deal, you're actually out up to 20k in taxes instantly in real hard cash, which hurts more than an on paper loss of 10k on the first property. The other property sounds pretty good, not amazing, but renting it out for 1400 that cost 140k is not that bad. I don't see how you don't cash flow from something like that.