Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago, 03/02/2017

User Stats

55
Posts
35
Votes
Dave Clauson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lawrence, KS
35
Votes |
55
Posts

How account for building code risk on old apartment

Dave Clauson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lawrence, KS
Posted
My partner and I are looking at a 100 year old apartment building. It's in a great location and under market rents. We are a lot of potential to update apartments and raise rents to market. The buildings have a good amount of deferred maintenance which we can estimate. Before we make an offer I'm trying to figure out how to size a risk. If we ever have to pull a permit for rehab we will need to bring the property up to code. That scares us on a 100 year old building as that could be huge dollars. How have you accounted for that risk? Thanks for any advice.

Loading replies...