Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 15 years ago on . Most recent reply
Is this realtor BS'n me?
Well here's the info for the property I'm working on:
http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/88/topics/35152-can-someone-analyze-this-please-
The owner bought it for $37 million in 2007. They are aware that they are going to take a hit.
There is a loan of $19.4MM that MUST be assumed (there's a pre-pay penalty).
The realtor is saying that there is no other options but to assume the loan....so the down payment will be whatever the amount is over $19.4MM.
My goal was to work on getting funding to purchase this property at $22MM, or $25MM maximum.
We called today to confirm that the Freddie Mac $19.4MM has to be assumed, and he said yes.
He told us that right now they have received 11 offers on the property...and ALL of these offers range from $27MM-$31MM. This property has been on the market for 6-8 weeks.
NOI on the 2008 and pro forma numbers states $2.3MM.
I'd say that most invesors will use an NOI of $2.0MM on this property to be safe.
Debt service on the Freddit Mac will be $1.45MM yearly.
That leaves a net income of $550,000.
So here's my questions:
1) How is it possible that there's already 11 offers?
2) How is it possible that ALL of these offers are over $27MM?
We all know that anybody with funds right now is going to buy something at rock-bottom price, so I have a hard time believing that there's 11 idiots out there (with money) who are offering $27MM-$31MM on this property.
Remember, at a $27MM purchase price, the investor is to put down $7.6MM. With that down payment, the cash-on-cash return is (550,000/7,600,000) 7.2%. This is somewhat believable, but I still think that any smart investor in this market (and there's only smart investors out there right now, because the stupid ones don't have money) will put a max price tag of $25MM for this property (same view as me).
At $31MM, the new owner is paying $11.6 as the down payment. That brings their return to (550,000/11,600,000) 4.7%. I don't believe this at all.
Basically....I called the agent. I said "let's say I offer $22MM on the property, 20% would be $4.4MM. The 80% would be $17.6MM. Does that mean that I would have to pay down the Freddie Mac loan (currently at $19.4MM) down to $17.6MM through escrow, to bring it down to 80%?"
He said "the down payment will be cash anything over $19.4MM, but if you're looking to offer $22MM, you're wasting your time. There's already 11 offers, and they all range from $27MM-$31MM."
I'm sure this agent is BS'n me. But what do you guys think?
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a5a7/1a5a715abd4fdd123ecc92c7ecdafa46c62b1899" alt="Scott Hubbard's profile image"
First, value is subjective to say the least. I believe you need to put yourself in the shoes of all possible suitors. So, I will attempt to play devils advocate for the benefit of this thread.
Mainly, commercial properties (multi-unit) where the financing is to be assumed will usually have a lot interest since it is very difficult to get new financing these days.
Secondly, where conservative investment strategies are in the forefront of the minds of most individual investors, this is not always the case for larger entities. Where my philosophy is Safety before Liquidity before Profit, many large REITs and large privately held RE investment firms look at profit before liquidity before safety as their guide posts.
Look no further than wall street for evidence to this fact. The demise of Lehman brothers, the bailout of AIG, as well as other lending institutions failures can all have been averted if they had exercised one premise above all, safety before profits.
My take on this scenario: These are not "idiots" who have out bid you, rather they are big fish who have a longer time line, more money, a higher threshold for low ROI, and do not want their competition to get this prize!! We cannot compete against that!