Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago, 04/22/2016

User Stats

87
Posts
9
Votes
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
9
Votes |
87
Posts

15, 20 or 30 year mortgage for analysis?

Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
Posted

Is the common practice to only analyze a deal financing over 30yr amortization or is it also common to use 20 or 15yr?

User Stats

55
Posts
21
Votes
Edward Peugh
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Charlotte, NC
21
Votes |
55
Posts
Edward Peugh
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Charlotte, NC
Replied

@Mike Bicho a typical analysis doesn't include debt service.  

One reason for that is that creating cashflow by leveraging debt is artificial.

Do the analysis without considering debt, then find how to finance the deal.

Happy to discuss specific numbers if you would like.

Ed

User Stats

213
Posts
74
Votes
David Chwaszczewski
  • Tega Cay, SC
74
Votes |
213
Posts
David Chwaszczewski
  • Tega Cay, SC
Replied

@Mike Bicho  It all depends on your investment strategy for that deal.  If you are looking for cashflow then 30 yr is your best friend.  

BiggerPockets logo
BiggerPockets
|
Sponsored
Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

User Stats

1,059
Posts
541
Votes
Kevin Hunter
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Carlisle, PA
541
Votes |
1,059
Posts
Kevin Hunter
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Carlisle, PA
Replied

Mike Bicho , it all depends on your personal preference. Do you want more cash flow or more equity sooner? If you want more cash flow then stretching the loan over a longer time will do that. If you want more equity to leverage then use the shorter loan. Endstate goals also matter. Your age and "get-out" strategy matter as well. What is the long term plan? Do you plan to hold for 20-30 years or would you like to liquidate at some point? The analyzers allow you to specify your personal preference because no one situation is thesame for everyone..... I would guess that more people starting off utilize the 30 year loan because the payments are lower but that shifts as folks build their portfolios and change or evolve their strategies.. Good luck.

User Stats

87
Posts
9
Votes
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
9
Votes |
87
Posts
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
Replied

@Kevin Hunter, great advice.  I do need to consider the end game first.  In my situation, cash flow is not as important to me and I would rather pay less interest over the life and gain equity.  I'll start by analyzing using 15 and 20 yr amortizations. I am 47 and want to use gained equity to continue buying.

User Stats

87
Posts
9
Votes
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
9
Votes |
87
Posts
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
Replied

@Kevin Hunter, great advice.  I do need to consider the end game first.  In my situation, cash flow is not as important to me and I would rather pay less interest over the life and gain equity.  I'll start by analyzing using 15 and 20 yr amortizations. I am 47 and want to use gained equity to continue buying.

User Stats

1,059
Posts
541
Votes
Kevin Hunter
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Carlisle, PA
541
Votes |
1,059
Posts
Kevin Hunter
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Carlisle, PA
Replied

@Mike Bicho, You should listen to Podcast 153 with Linda McKissack.  She and her husband started investing in their 40s as well and they utilized the 15 year mortgages because of the compressed timeline.  It is a great podcast and sounds like you are in a similar situation. 

User Stats

2,953
Posts
4,474
Votes
Alexander Felice
Pro Member
  • Guy with Great Hair
  • Austin, TX
4,474
Votes |
2,953
Posts
Alexander Felice
Pro Member
  • Guy with Great Hair
  • Austin, TX
Replied

15 year doesn't really provide much benefit. you might get a lower rate, but that shouldn't affect cash flow much. You may build equity faster, but you can't spend equity.

take the 30 year, the higher cashflow, and the lower payment.

You still have the option to pay the loan off in 15 years, but with a 15 year note, you lose the option to pay it off in 30.

User Stats

980
Posts
817
Votes
Edward B.
  • Investor
  • Midlothian, VA
817
Votes |
980
Posts
Edward B.
  • Investor
  • Midlothian, VA
Replied

@Mike Bicho, I completely agree with @Alexander Felice. Yes if you actually paid off the loan in 15 years the 30 year loan would cost you more to the tune of several thousands of dollars. But the flexibility of not HAVING to make that larger payment more than offsets that cost in my opinion. The 15yr mortgage is really just a forced saving plan. So if you need to be forced to save money somewhere that is difficult to get at then you may want to consider it. However, if you are disciplined with your money, you will not want it locked up in equity where it is difficult and expensive to access. After all it is very difficult to get seconds on investment property so you will be looking at refinancing or selling to access the equity, both costly options that totally wipe out the benefit of the 15yr, i.e. the lower rate. You may as well consider ARMs if you want to get your rate down and plan to access the equity in the future. Of course, I believe it is better to own property on your balance sheet, not outright, so my opinion may not count for much.

User Stats

87
Posts
9
Votes
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
9
Votes |
87
Posts
Mike Bicho
  • Investor
  • Westport, Ma
Replied

@Kevin Hunter, thank you for pod cast tip, I'm on a flight right now and have 2 hrs to kill.

Also thank you to @Alexander Felice and @Edward B.

User Stats

1,981
Posts
1,198
Votes
Bryan O.
  • Specialist
  • Lakewood, CO
1,198
Votes |
1,981
Posts
Bryan O.
  • Specialist
  • Lakewood, CO
Replied

@Mike Bicho I would recommend using all of them just to see the difference. If you are putting them in your own name, focus on your 30-year. If you will hold them in an entity, you'll probably find the 20 year to apply to you. You decide which numbers are important based on what your own goals and abilities are.