Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago,

User Stats

28
Posts
5
Votes
Mike R.
  • Investor
  • Orwigsburg, PA
5
Votes |
28
Posts

Would you pay full retail for excellent cash flow?

Mike R.
  • Investor
  • Orwigsburg, PA
Posted

@Brandon Turner and others often talk about making sure you have cash flow AND equity going into every buy-and-hold deal. But are there any circumstances where you'd pay full retail if the cash flow is good enough?

There's a triplex in my area listed at $85,000. Rents are $2,390. 

Using the 50 percent rule to ballpark expenses, and a P&I payment of $315 ($68K loan, 30-year mortgage, 3.75 percent interest), that's $880 per month cash flow, or $292 per door. 

This triplex is listed at full retail; it's an area where houses do not appreciate; and there is probably some deferred maintenance. So that's three strikes against it. 

But, still ... does the cash flow make this house warrant a closer look?

Thanks,

Mike

Loading replies...