Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 3 days ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
2
Votes
Adrian Au
  • New to Real Estate
  • Brooklyn, NY
2
Votes |
1
Posts

First BRRRR Deal, does this make sense?

Adrian Au
  • New to Real Estate
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted

Hello!

I am planning to invest into a real estate with a business partner. We have identified a duplex in Philadelphia. We plan to purchase this property and rehab this property with cash, and obtain a cash-out refi. This would be my first property deal, my business partner already has multiple homes. My primary goal is to own enough cash-flow properties that can eventually replace my income. 

Acquisition cost: $220k

Rehab cost: $65k

ARV: $325k

Total monthly rental income from both units: $2500.

After financing, we would cash flow $400 per month, after vacancy, delinquency, cap-ex, taxes. 

The cash-on-cash return is only around 8%. However, the ROI after cash-out would be around 45%, which includes an assumed property appreciation at 4%, and tax benefits.

The Gross Rent Multiplier is around 9.5.

Is this a good deal? What else should I look for? There are not of multi-family inventory in the are looking at. Any thoughts, tips, concerns would be appreciated, thank you!

Adrian A.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,149
Posts
1,733
Votes
Stuart Udis
#2 Goals, Business Plans & Entities Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
1,733
Votes |
1,149
Posts
Stuart Udis
#2 Goals, Business Plans & Entities Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Replied

@Adrian Au Without knowing the debt terms for the refinance there’s no way of confirming  the cash flow assumptions but back of the envelope calcs suggest the cash flow will  be less than $400/m on $1,200/m rentals. 

Using round number a $150,000 loan amortized over 25 years at 7% interest is $1,060/m. With the loan terms I provided as an example and 30% expense ratio you are below $400/unit. I would imagine you are anticipating a loan of more than 46% LTV.

If you believe my 30-35% expense ratio is off, I want to remind you with operating real estate the costs are the costs. By this I mean many costs associated with a $1,200 unit will be the same as a $2,000 unit in the same market. Let’s just assume the $1,200/units are 1 beds. When that sink leaks it costs the same to repair as the sink in the $2,000 unit bathroom. When the exterminator has to be scheduled it costs the same. When the curb trap has to be replaced it costs the same etc etc. Therefore the $1,200 rental struggles to absorb the costs as well. I’m not suggesting owning $1,200 rentals are bad investments, but I wouldn’t expect $400/m in cash flow unless you have very low levered and or cheap debt. 

Next, GRM is particularly meaningless with lower cost rentals. Remember they are disproportionately impacted by cap ex and operating expenses. You should throw this out entirely.

Last, to temper expectations it’s very difficult to replace W2 income with cash flow. Very few succeed. Most who are able to pursue real estate in place of W2 employment are able because they collect fees from an affiliate service (normally construction) or develop with a healthy pipeline where fees are built into their projects. 

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...