Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 hours ago, 12/04/2024

User Stats

1
Posts
1
Votes
Tom Evans
1
Votes |
1
Posts

Does a shared well agreement prohibit STR usage?

Tom Evans
Posted

Hi all - I'm looking at purchasing a property in Scottsdale, AZ for usage as an STR. It's outside Scottsdale city limits (Maricopa County jurisdiction) so it is not subject to Scottsdale's restrictions.

It does, however, have a shared well agreement with one other parcel (as almost all in this area seem to). The agreement stipulates:

"The owners agree, that no water shall be used for commercial purpose, but only for their private domestic use including vegetable gardens and livestock maintenance."

Commercial purpose is not defined, so I'm not sure if an STR would violate that covenant. It does later say in the agreement that it is:

"binding upon persons who own, lease, sublease, or occupy any parcel or portion thereof"

The inclusion of which seems to imply that long term renting and/or subleasing would NOT be commercial use.

I'm trying to figure out if I'm taking a significant risk buying this property for use as an STR. There are so many rentals in the area, probably on shared wells, so those people have either decided the STR use is okay or they are comfortable risking it.

My intuition is that any actual disagreement over water usage could be handled with the other owner; but the risk would be if the other owner just doesn't like the STR and wants to use the well agreement as a reason to demand it be shut down.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Tom

User Stats

1,029
Posts
779
Votes
James Mc Ree
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Malvern, PA
779
Votes |
1,029
Posts
James Mc Ree
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Malvern, PA
Replied

Are the other parties to the agreement the property owner sharing the well and maybe an HOA? Those are the people you want to talk with about this. The snippet you provided is a bit ambiguous which may itself make it unenforceable.

I think your goal should be to get a signed doc from the parties to the agreement saying an STR is permitted under the agreement.

User Stats

365
Posts
185
Votes
Mason Weiss
Agent
  • Realtor
  • Phoenix, AZ
185
Votes |
365
Posts
Mason Weiss
Agent
  • Realtor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Replied

Hey Tom, no matter what I would have a real estate lawyer look over this before you purchase the property. Although the forum input can be helpful, you need to have proper legal precautions in place rather than opinion.

BiggerPockets logo
Join Our Private Community for Passive Investors
|
BiggerPockets
Get first-hand insights and real sponsor reviews from other investors