Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago,

User Stats

24
Posts
4
Votes
Parul S.
  • New York, Ny
4
Votes |
24
Posts

Why is this not a good deal?

Parul S.
  • New York, Ny
Posted

I'm trying to get better at gauging why certain properties have not been touched by buyers, and sit on the market for 9+ months.

I found a multi-family listed currently listed for $57,000, that has been on the market for the last 9 months, and reduced its price by ~2% every 3-4 months.

It consists of 4 units rented with $1350 total income. All units are 1bd, 1ba. Back 2 units rent for $300 front units rent for $375. 2 separate buildings - front 900 sq ft, back 2 are 576 sq ft.

My question - if the rental income is accurate, why is this still on the market even though it meets the 2% rule? Is it because of the pains of renting 4 separate units, implying more vacancies, more work/property manager fees to keep them rented?

Thank-you!

Loading replies...