Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Austin Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Arunesh Chandra
0
Votes |
1
Posts

Newer Homes smaller lots v/s Older homes with bigger lots

Arunesh Chandra
Posted

I'm an Austin area newbie, looking to do a buy & hold kinda investment with positive cash flow. Trying to figure out if older communities with bigger lot sizes are better investment that newer homes with smaller lot sizes, from an appreciation perspective. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

184
Posts
229
Votes
Alex G.
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
229
Votes |
184
Posts
Alex G.
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Replied

Any investor who doesn’t understand that Austin is going through a major construction boom will completely miss out on one of the most lucrative opportunities we have here.  There is a huge demand for infill lots for new construction within the city that will likely continue for years. 

Right now the demand is primarily in the more central areas.  However, due to rapidly escalating costs of buildable lots, the demand has been spreading outwards as small builders search for cheaper lots to build on.

In that regard, it’s not a matter of whether the house is old or new. It’s a matter of whether you’ve got a lot you can build more on than presently is built there. Or will be able to to build eventually, assuming CodeNext ever becomes a reality.

If you’ve got a lot like this, there is a chance you can carve out 1-2 extra lots in the back through subdividing. Or you may already have it through favorable current zoning or a future zoning proposed by CodeNext.




For example, current zoning of this 0.40ac lot allows only one dwelling per lot, that of course already sits there. If you subdivide this lot and get extra 2 lots out of it, you now got 2 new vacant infill lots for 2 more SFRs.

If CodeNext passes in its current version, you’ll have an opportunity to get up to 7 (yes, seven!) units on this lot, using a “preservation” provision of the new version to keep the old house on the front rather than tearing it down. What do you think this will do to the value of your property?? That’s a forced value creation that will far exceed any appreciation you can hope for or any cash flow you could potentially extract from just a a single family home.

Plenty of opportunities here: (1) sell the lots to raise cash and pay off your loans on your existing house to get free and clear property for a long term hold, (2) Sell the front house keep the lots for long term appreciation (they will appreciate at the same rate as houses nearby), (3) Trade a lot to a builder to get him to build a small home on the back lot for you at a very low cost, (4) Sell some of these lots with owner financing for cash flow... And so on.

You have to be patient with these opportunities as subdividing your lot takes time and capital, monetizing your lot(s) takes time while you’re paying taxes, maintaining it, etc. But the $$ payoff is certainly worth it.

Happy bargain hunting!

Loading replies...