Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Philadelphia Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

81
Posts
27
Votes
Alex T.
  • Philadelphia, PA
27
Votes |
81
Posts

Height Requirement on RSA5 Property

Alex T.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

I'm adding a 3rd story to an RSA5 property...which has a 38' max height requirement to the roof line. I'm doing a fiberglass roof deck on top with a 36" high parapet around the whole thing. I can't get complete clarity on this, would the parapet count within the 38' height? I have read in the code that railings can protrude up to 48" above the 38' requirement. My architect says he's done projects where they've been slightly over 38' and had to rip everything down. Due to this he is taking a very conservative route by designing the parapet top to sit at 37' above the ground. I'd much rather add an extra foot to the 2nd and 3rd floors! Does anyone have experience with this? Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

38
Posts
18
Votes
Tim Sharkey
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
18
Votes |
38
Posts
Tim Sharkey
  • Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

Funny how the architects don't know these things and yet they're the highest paid per hour on the whole job.

Beware anyone (architect or otherwise) that tells you "yeah we had to rip it all out and do it over again" after L&I or some other inspection....  I've found that's often times an urban legend.  L&I in philadelphia is NOT excessively prohibitive the way many contractors and architects lead you to believe.

And why would your architect be a part of a project that went slightly over 38?  Wasn't he the design professional and person in charge of building it to code?

Get the extra foot and get a new architect if you haven't paid them too much already!

Good luck!

Loading replies...