Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

136
Posts
50
Votes
Gil Ganz
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Austin, TX
50
Votes |
136
Posts

Large legal balance in non judicial states

Gil Ganz
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Hey
I have been seeing something that seems weird to me, I see assets in tapes i get that are from a non judicial state, one that is also quite a quick foreclosure one, having a large legal balance on top of the UPB.
For example an asset in Texas worth 70k (CMV a little bit higher) with the total legal balance being 110k. How does that makes sense? Isn't the foreclosure process so quick in Texas that it should not reach such a large sum? (Both in absolute value and in compared to the house value)

Loading replies...