Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,723
Posts
1,451
Votes
Bob Malecki#5 Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes Contributor
  • Investor
  • Kingston, WA
1,451
Votes |
1,723
Posts

Significant Modification and Phantom Income

Bob Malecki#5 Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes Contributor
  • Investor
  • Kingston, WA
Posted

We are finalizing our new private equity fund to acquire both first and second residential NPLs. Our current tax accountant has provided us info on the phantom income component which can result if performing a "significant modification" to the NPL, which would be a change in rate, term or payment. Essentially as I understand it, the IRS may view the mod as a 'new loan' there is a taxable gain from the cost basis of the NPL to the UPB.

Has anyone explored this and have any comments or resources to clarify?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

553
Posts
490
Votes
Mike Hartzog
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
490
Votes |
553
Posts
Mike Hartzog
  • Lender
  • Redmond, WA
Replied

Dan's comment got me thinking that the accountant may be talking about debt forgiveness being a taxable event for the borrower, not a taxable event for the  lender.  That does make sense.  Can you clarify Bob? 

  • Mike Hartzog
  • Loading replies...