Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

95
Posts
59
Votes
Eric S.
  • Glen Ellyn, IL
59
Votes |
95
Posts

Chap 13 bankruptcy question-2nd mortgage note

Eric S.
  • Glen Ellyn, IL
Posted

Fellow Note Investors,

I am reviewing the Chap 13 BK filing and plan in Pacer on a 2nd mortgage that is 100% secured.  The Chapter 13 plan calls for the arrearages to be repaid over 60 months, but does not include the original mortgage payment anywhere in the plan.  

Once the debtor reaffirms the debt, is it a given that the debtor will begin making the regular monthly payment as well as the payment towards arrearages during the term of the plan?

I want to make sure that since the original payment is not in the plan, that the plan does not create a "forbearance" in which the debtor only makes payments towards arrearages and the monthly payment is put on hold until the end of the plan.  

Thank you for your help!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

309
Posts
100
Votes
Sandy Uhlmann
  • Investor
  • Jefferson City, MO
100
Votes |
309
Posts
Sandy Uhlmann
  • Investor
  • Jefferson City, MO
Replied

In BK, NOTHING is a given.  I owed a well secured second and borrower was suppose to make payments to the first outside of the plan. He did not.  The first filed for a relief of stay because the borrower failed to pay them during the BK period.  I can only assume that they will be filing for FC as soon as the stay is lifted.

BK attorneys for the borrower have gotten very crafty these days in ways to try to protect their clients and make the note holders very uncomfortable. I had one file an adversarial proceeding against my company-totally bogus but I had to spend money fighting it in court. They attempted to cram down a loan that had over $50,000 in equity because the HELOC was coming due during the BK period citing HELOCs as a "short term loan." The tricks go on and on......

Loading replies...