Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

90
Posts
26
Votes
Andy More
  • Residential Lender
  • Columbia, MO
26
Votes |
90
Posts

Flipping 3 properties side by side

Andy More
  • Residential Lender
  • Columbia, MO
Posted

Lets say you wanted to flip a property and required a 25k profit for it to be worth the effort. Would you be willing to reduce that minimum 25k profit if you could flip 3 identical properties that are all side by side?

It seems reasonable to me to reduce the required profit per property since there will be economies of scale when all 3 properties are in the same location like this.

Thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,196
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,196
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

My take is slightly different than those above...

I actually like rehabbing multiple properties in the same subdivision for a couple reasons:

1. The very biggest reason is that I get to set my own comps. By ensuring that the first house I sell is the one that will comp the highest (most square footage, most rooms, best finishes, etc), I have the opportunity to bring the value of the other properties up. Also, appraisals are much less difficult on the subsequent sales, since there is at least one good comp;

2. I find that we get more traffic through houses when they are close together. Buyers are willing to travel a bit further if they can see three houses at once instead of traveling to see one house. Also, buyers like the idea of getting to pick which house they like best, assuming they already like the neighborhood;

3. Economies of scale play into it a bit, mostly because houses in the same subdivision often require the same amount of work, making our contractor's job a bit easier and straight-forward;

4. We ensure that before every showing we turn on all the lights, open the blinds, etc. When our houses are all right next to each other, it makes opening them up (and then locking them back up) much easier every time there is a showing.

In general, I'll give up a little bit of profit (10% or so) to buy multiple houses in the same neighborhood. In fact, we just put one under contract yesterday that will have a slightly lower profit margin than we normally look for, because it's two doors down from another property that we're selling.

We're making an offer on one a couple doors down on the other side tomorrow...

Loading replies...