Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

419
Posts
52
Votes
Nick Brubaker
  • Decatur, GA
52
Votes |
419
Posts

Question on a basic principle

Nick Brubaker
  • Decatur, GA
Posted

The 2017 Cost vs. Value Data (http://www.remodeling.hw.net/cost-vs-value/2017/) shows that aside from the installation of attic insulation for no other home improvement project are the costs invested able to be recouped upon the sale of a property.  An average of maybe 65% of the cost is able to be recouped in most cases.  This is a basic principle that I am confused about.  If it is the case that money invested into a house through renovations, additions, etc. is not recouped fully or more in a sale than how do flips or any kind of renovation pre-sale (aside from insulation) make sense.  Why would I put $60k into a new bathroom if it only adds $30k of value to the house (https://www.nari.org/assets/1/28/Remodeling_Impact...)?  Similarly, all other factors excluded, would this mean that if I bought a house for $200k and decided I needed an additional bedroom it would make more sense to sell the house and buy a different house for $260k with the additional bedroom than spend $120k to add the bedroom to the house I already own?  

Have I been misguided in assuming that flips and renovations are possible because the costs invested plus an additional margin/profit are to be expected upon sale?  I get the idea that if renovations that you desire are done on a house you live in long before you plan to sell it you are able to enjoy the improvements for a period, which makes up for the inability to recoup the costs fully on a sale.  However, why does it make sense to do work to a house before selling it?  Or why does it make sense to buy a house that needs work with the expectation that you would pay for renovations afterward when the returns in actual value/equity are not comparable?

Does this make sense?  What am I missing here?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

103
Posts
95
Votes
Tom W.
  • Oak Ridge, NJ
95
Votes |
103
Posts
Tom W.
  • Oak Ridge, NJ
Replied

@Nick Brubaker

You’re not taking into account the fact that you need to purchase a distressed property at below market value when you flip. Your profit will be made when you purchase, not when you sell. The amount you invest in repairs or upgrades will be based on what the value of the property will be after the work is complete.

Loading replies...