Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 hours ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

48
Posts
28
Votes
Tyrell Proby
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
28
Votes |
48
Posts

Lowest Rate W/ Points OR Higher Rate No Points?

Tyrell Proby
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale, AZ
Posted

When financing your flips, do you focus more on getting the lowest interest rate or avoiding upfront points?

I recently spoke with an investor who takes a 6-month loan at 16% interest with no points because he consistently flips in 3 months or less. Even though the rate is higher, he avoids the 2 points ($4,000 on a $200K loan) that come with lower-rate loans.

By closing out the loan early, he only pays $8,000 in interest versus a lower-rate loan at 10% with 2 points, which would cost him $9,000 total ($5,000 interest + $4,000 points). For those who turn projects fast, does a higher rate with no points make more sense for your deals? Or do you still go for the lowest rate possible?

Let me know what you think.

Loading replies...