Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

3,500
Posts
2,607
Votes
David Krulac
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
2,607
Votes |
3,500
Posts

I'm against buying flood zone properties, but that's just me...

David Krulac
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
Posted

Met with a CPA this week and he said that he thought the 180 degree opposite of what I think; which is to stay away from flood zone property, the rates are escalating and the flood maps are being redrawn and flood insurance premiums will continue to increase in the coming years and this will have a negative effect on re-selling FZ properties. Buyers will not be able to get financing without paying high rates and the buying pool of cash buyers, who also don't care about flood hazards is small.

The CPA counterpoint is that he can buy these properties at bargain prices due to the fear an angst surrounding FZ props. He would buy them for cash and not have to get financing and therefore would not be required to get flood insurance. He effectively would be self flood insuring these properties, keeping them long term and renting them out.

What say you?

Loading replies...