Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago,

User Stats

292
Posts
81
Votes
Ben Skove
  • Cincinnati, OH
81
Votes |
292
Posts

Looking at a property to buy & hold in a flood plain

Ben Skove
  • Cincinnati, OH
Posted

Hi folks,

I'm looking at a 3/1 REO going for $14K, rent comps around $700. I won't know the repairs until getting in today, but it appears in reasonable shape, probably no more than $15K.

It's mapped into FEMA's high-risk flood zone. The property is located in an area protected by a levee; unfortunately, FEMA has stated that they don't believe the levee would protect against a 100-year flood, and thus is still considered high-risk.

Given the house was built in 1875 and apparently survived the area's worst flood in 1937, as well as others, and given that the levee apparently protects against all but the worst floods, I'm thinking of simply skipping flood insurance. I don't need to worry about it being unmortgageable, since it'd be a cash purchase. It would likely prevent selling to anyone but an investor in the future, though.

In the event of a flood, I'd build up enough cash reserves from the property to either repair or demolish. I'd either strongly encourage or require renters to carry renters insurance for flooding.

Thoughts?

Loading replies...