Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Investor Mindset
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

84
Posts
107
Votes
Peter Eberhardt
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
107
Votes |
84
Posts

Out of state vs. backyard

Peter Eberhardt
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hey all, I am just getting into real estate and want to see these two sides from other perspectives. I feel as though I understand the pros and cons of each throughly and have chosen out of state.

I live in San Diego, purchased a condo about 3 years ago and currently house hacking. I did a light to moderate remodel (new hard floors, carpet, popcorn ceiling removal, paint, new kitchen cabinets, electrical) and it has appreciated (with the help of Covid of course) 60k already. My goals are to buy and hold for cash flow, start with SFH and move up to multiunit.

I really want to invest in my backyard. It makes so much more sense, I know the area, I know the prices, I know the rents, I can do so much more here as far as fixing up places myself for way cheaper, and managing everything myself. But, the prices are so high and the numbers don’t work. If I rented out my entire condo I would still be negative $50 cash flow. Buying into most places here would barely meet the 0.5% rule.

So, I am looking to other markets, Columbus specifically. I can buy three SFH there for the price of one here. I'll never know the area as good as I do here, I'll have to have help managing, appreciation is not as quick, and I'll have to get things close to turnkey as possible to start until I can find honest contractors. But then again, who is to say I'll be in San Diego forever and this market too will become a distant investment.

I know everyone’s goals, opinions, and desirability factors are different, but from the generic standpoint what is your perspective? Less cash flow in your backyard, or more cash flow 2200 miles away?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,380
Posts
1,186
Votes
Twana Rasoul
  • Real Estate Agent
  • San Diego, CA
1,186
Votes |
1,380
Posts
Twana Rasoul
  • Real Estate Agent
  • San Diego, CA
Replied

@Peter Eberhardt You started off the right way by buying local and house hacking.  you have found that it has worked well for you, why not continue? initial cashflow is overrated a bit and misunderstood.  I've made much more on my initial negative cashflow properties locally than I ever will on my positive cashflow out of state properties.  Buy your next house hack now, a single family home and rent out the other rooms, or my preference, multifamily.

  • Twana Rasoul

Loading replies...