Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

106
Posts
29
Votes
James Bynum
  • Phoenix, AZ
29
Votes |
106
Posts

Paying sellers mortgage while you flip their home??

James Bynum
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

I have been thinking about this later and searched a little for this and found nothing. Could this be a way to flip a home with little money invested?

My idea is this. You find a seller that has say $50,000 left on their mortgage for a house that could be worth $150,000 after a pretty extensive rehab, right now the home is probably worth $70,000. Would it be legally possible (both not getting in trouble for doing it and the seller couldn't screw you over once the home was rehabbed) to offer to take over all the payments of the home during the rehab so in essence the seller can pretty much walk away from the property at that point, even though the mortgage would still be in their name, you would just be cutting the check for it. And then once the home is flipped and sold you could give the seller a percentage of the profit from the sale.

I feel like some sellers might like this idea as they could potentially get more money than they would have gotten if the flipper had just purchased the home or sent the home through a short sale and gotten it cheaper. Yet the flipper doesn't have to make a huge investment to get the home, just has to finance the flip.

Am I crazy, or could this actually work?

Loading replies...