Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
6
Votes
Scott Morris
  • Wholesaler
  • Kennewick, WA
6
Votes |
24
Posts

Renting to yourself

Scott Morris
  • Wholesaler
  • Kennewick, WA
Posted

I've been thinking about this for quite some time. It seems like renting from yourself (or through an entity you own) would be a great way to reduce expenses/taxes overall. Renting from yourself would have a few of advantages over owning:

Depreciation deduction of the property,

Deductions of repairs (this is different than improvements),

Privacy/Risk (you no longer own a property in your own name)

It would have some disadvantages:

Loss of tax protected appreciation when sold (although a 1031 exchange handles that)

The only question remains is this frowned upon (audit risk) by the IRS? Has anyone done this? It seems to me that it is often done in the commercial world. A company buys a large building in a holding entity. Leases out part of it to itself (the other parts are leased to other companies). Why would residential be any different?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,314
Posts
587
Votes
Rob Beland
  • Investor
  • Leominster, MA
587
Votes |
1,314
Posts
Rob Beland
  • Investor
  • Leominster, MA
Replied

Short answer is no @Scott Morris. The IRS does not allow the personal occupancy of an investment property as a way to reduce taxes. Think of a duplex. You own it and live in one side. You can only deduct half of depreciation expenses and half of repairs that benefit the entire property such as a roof repair. You can't deduct any repairs or maintenance to the inside of your unit. 

Loading replies...