Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
1
Votes
Kira Volpi
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Leawood, KS
1
Votes |
14
Posts

Contractor Partnerships Fair Profit Split

Kira Volpi
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Leawood, KS
Posted

I have read several posts on this subject but none I could find that spell out my potential situation. Here it is:

I'm contemplating a partnership with a contractor.

I would provide 100% of financing and rehab cost of materials.

He would provide finding property

Rehabbing the property

However, I would have to pay him for his labor and his crews labor.

I know that isn't ideal for me as a funding partner but here is what I think he can offer me at least for the short term since I am new to this area and don't have a team or knowledge of areas to invest.

He can find properties that he has been doing as an investor himself. He can, if he is forthcoming about his true costs, provide better prices on materials etc.

I am weary about him not having any true skin in the game but it is a risk I'm willing to take since the property will remain in my name and the price of the properties could be potentially low enough so if I loose it won't be huge money.

Looking for input and suggestions of what a "fair to him and to me" split would be.

All input will be greatly appreciated and "YES" I would love to hear from contractors as well.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,196
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,196
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

Personally, I think this is a horrible idea. Some (too many, in my opinion) contractors aren't very skilled, aren't very reliable and aren't very efficient (not putting down contractors, just stating the obvious). The good part is, they're easily replaceable should they turn out to not be a good fit for your project or not have the qualifications to get the job done.

But, if the contractor is a partner, it makes it very difficult to fire him and hire someone else. Meaning, if your partner/contractor isn't very good, the likelihood is that you'll lose money. It's even worse when the contractor/partner has no skin in the game.

Now, in your particular scenario, the contractor is finding the deal and doing the work. But, he's getting paid to do the work (just like any other contractor). So, really the only thing he's doing to provide additional value over and above any other contractor is finding the deal. Is that really worth giving up 50% (or however much) of the profit? Not in my opinion.

If your contractor wants to help you find deals, let him wholesale the deals to you for a fee, and then hire him (or don't) to do the work. That way, you're not giving up an excessive amount of equity to someone just for finding the deal PLUS you'll still have the flexibility to use other contractors should he not work out very well.

Loading replies...