Please ask your Realtor and Lender about Seller Concessions

Please ask your Realtor and Lender about Seller Concessions

AJ WongBusiness Member
Real Estate Broker · Oregon & California Coast · Member since 2022 · 822 posts · 695 votes

To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

So for example:

Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

 A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

- One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

- The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

Cheers. 

Sesemi | STR Brokers powered by Fathom Realty 516 Reviews
4Reply
113 views

Most Popular Reply

Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
3y
Quote from @Don Konipol:

“After I posted this I had two offers accepted utilizing concessions and the seller's broker counter included the wrong math.. Excellent tool, nothing new under the sun.”

@AJ Wong your success is well earned.  You’re going well beyond what most real estate brokers do to become successful.  I’m sure long term you will be able to have a GREAT career in real estate.  Well done. 


I find in certain parts of the country we do business seller concessions have been on going for for many years. its just the norm in areas of the mid west and deep south where you have folks that simply wont qualify any other way than to have seller assist ( which is what they call it). As a very active seller I know this going in so I know my closing costs at least to owner occ are going to be right at 10% of gross sales price.. Not so much on investment props.  On my New builds in Canby Oregon we have not had to do this but maybe one time and usually raise asking price to cover it.. However our project is a lot of empty nesters who simply dont need the additional seller assist help.. so fortunate there.
See this reply in the discussion

9 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    3y
    Quote from @AJ Wong:

    To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

    That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

    In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

    So for example:

    Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

    This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

    HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

    So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

    Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

    Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

    There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

    Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

     A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

    Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

    Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

    This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

    We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

    The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

    Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

    Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

    - One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

    - The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

    There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

    Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

    Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

    PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

    So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

    Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

    Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

    Cheers. 

    This was the basic way property was sold 1978 - 1984 when interest rates were double digits - as high as 17%.
    Realtors haven’t been used to this in the last 20 + years so have no experience with it. 
    It’s a way to minimize down payment and or minimize initial monthly payments thereby increasing the buyer pool by enabling more people to “qualify” or more people having the ability to purchase said property.  

    Here’s my advice - when making an offer such as you describe add a math sheet showing gross funds to the seller, seller fees, and net funds to the seller.  
    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
  • AJ WongBusiness Member
    OP
    Real Estate Broker · Oregon & California Coast · Member since 2022 · 822 posts · 695 votes
    3y
    Quote from @Don Konipol:
    Quote from @AJ Wong:

    To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

    That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

    In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

    So for example:

    Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

    This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

    HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

    So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

    Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

    Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

    There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

    Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

     A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

    Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

    Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

    This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

    We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

    The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

    Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

    Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

    - One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

    - The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

    There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

    Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

    Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

    PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

    So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

    Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

    Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

    Cheers. 

    This was the basic way property was sold 1978 - 1984 when interest rates were double digits - as high as 17%.
    Realtors haven’t been used to this in the last 20 + years so have no experience with it. 
    It’s a way to minimize down payment and or minimize initial monthly payments thereby increasing the buyer pool by enabling more people to “qualify” or more people having the ability to purchase said property.  

    Here’s my advice - when making an offer such as you describe add a math sheet showing gross funds to the seller, seller fees, and net funds to the seller.  

     Wow. Could not have said it better myself! Thank you!! After I posted this I had two offers accepted utilizing concessions and the seller's broker counter included the wrong math.. Excellent tool, nothing new under the sun. 

    Sesemi | STR Brokers powered by Fathom Realty 516 Reviews
  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    3y

    “After I posted this I had two offers accepted utilizing concessions and the seller's broker counter included the wrong math.. Excellent tool, nothing new under the sun.”

    @AJ Wong your success is well earned.  You’re going well beyond what most real estate brokers do to become successful.  I’m sure long term you will be able to have a GREAT career in real estate.  Well done. 

    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
  • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
    Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
    3y
    Quote from @Don Konipol:

    “After I posted this I had two offers accepted utilizing concessions and the seller's broker counter included the wrong math.. Excellent tool, nothing new under the sun.”

    @AJ Wong your success is well earned.  You’re going well beyond what most real estate brokers do to become successful.  I’m sure long term you will be able to have a GREAT career in real estate.  Well done. 


    I find in certain parts of the country we do business seller concessions have been on going for for many years. its just the norm in areas of the mid west and deep south where you have folks that simply wont qualify any other way than to have seller assist ( which is what they call it). As a very active seller I know this going in so I know my closing costs at least to owner occ are going to be right at 10% of gross sales price.. Not so much on investment props.  On my New builds in Canby Oregon we have not had to do this but maybe one time and usually raise asking price to cover it.. However our project is a lot of empty nesters who simply dont need the additional seller assist help.. so fortunate there.
  • AJ WongBusiness Member
    OP
    Real Estate Broker · Oregon & California Coast · Member since 2022 · 822 posts · 695 votes
    3y
    Quote from @Don Konipol:

    “After I posted this I had two offers accepted utilizing concessions and the seller's broker counter included the wrong math.. Excellent tool, nothing new under the sun.”

    @AJ Wong your success is well earned.  You’re going well beyond what most real estate brokers do to become successful.  I’m sure long term you will be able to have a GREAT career in real estate.  Well done. 


     Thank you Don. Particularly nowadays we all should be earning our dues. If we can't add considerable value to transactions or for our clients, we will be replaced or unnecessary. I began investing in the coast, partially because I noticed a the lack of intensity and competition for prime real estate and the perceived future demand of saw assets. I believe my reputation and business has expanded exponentially because the resources buyers require to execute confidently and efficiently is often lacking in certain rural areas serviced by 'established' and 'comfortable' local brokers and professionals. 

    Also the current rate environment has caused many buyers to pause, so there is opportunity for buyers to present without the distraction of multiple offers or competition. 

    Sesemi | STR Brokers powered by Fathom Realty 516 Reviews
  • Grant SchroederPro Member
    Lender · OR ID AZ CA WA CO NV TN MT · Member since 2018 · 598 posts · 312 votes
    3y
    Quote from @AJ Wong:

    To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

    That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

    In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

    So for example:

    Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

    This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

    HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

    So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

    Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

    Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

    There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

    Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

     A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

    Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

    Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

    This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

    We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

    The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

    Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

    Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

    - One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

    - The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

    There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

    Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

    Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

    PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

    So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

    Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

    Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

    Cheers. 


    Yes sir!! You and I have helped clients make a killing with this strategy by educating them on it upfront when structuring offers!

  • Lender · Los Angeles, CA · Member since 2008 · 35 posts · 9 votes
    3y
    Quote from @AJ Wong:

    To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

    That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

    In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

    So for example:

    Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

    This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

    HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

    So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

    Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

    Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

    There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

    Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

     A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

    Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

    Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

    This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

    We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

    The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

    Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

    Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

    - One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

    - The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

    There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

    Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

    Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

    PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

    So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

    Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

    Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

    Cheers. 

    I've tried asking my realtors to present offers with some seller concession. I've  shown the figures and explained how the numbers will work  but in the red hot SoCal market they won't even let me finish what I'm saying.  Now that the market is shifting there may be more opportunity to use these options. 
  • Member since 2020 · 66 posts · 43 votes
    3y

    @AJ Wong

    The Portland Metro area experienced a normal seasonal slowdown in the Winter. Two of my listings in February/March were advertised with seller paid concessions. We offered 10k and 8K for the buyer to use to pay closing cost or buy down their mortgage rate. This is a great tool for investors and realtors to keep in their toolbox when property is not selling. 

  • New to Real Estate · NJ · Member since 2023 · 21 posts · 6 votes
    2y
    Quote from @AJ Wong:

    To be fair, I'm posting this as much for investors as I am for other Realtors. Partly because in times like these (or any market really) seller concessions can be an excellent tool for improving buyer conditions, but also because when I write offers inclusive of a concession I'd like the Realtor's on the receiving end to know how to present them to their sellers effectively. 

    That's not necessarily a knock on other real estate brokers, seller concessions are difficult to digest but Realtor's on the 'other side' sometimes treat an offer with a concession like it's the "boogeyman." Yes, there is math, and other elements that can can easily effect one's full comprehension about how they 'work' and the NET result to each party, but when properly utilized, concessions offer buyers incentives, and sellers huge space for compromise. 

    In a nut shell, a seller concession is usually a percentage of the sales price or fixed dollar amount, that the seller contributes towards the buyers expenses (closing costs, pre-paids or interest rate buy down) that can essentially be financed. Typically 2-3% but on certain property types and lending programs as high as 6-9%!* 

    So for example:

    Listing price is $105k and the seller receives an offer for a $100k Sales Price with a 3% seller concession. 

    This means that the the sales price will be $100k WITH 97% of $100k, OR $97k is DUE SELLER.

    HOWEVER, the buyer's financing is based on the SALES price. So..let's say buyer A is putting 10% down. 10% of what? $100k (The sales price) OR $10k down. The loan amount will be based on 90% of the $100k sales price. Or a Loan Amount of $90k.

    So where does the 3% of $100k go? Toward's the buyer's closing costs. Usually towards title charges, prepaids (taxes and insurance), loan costs or prepaid interest in the form of an interest rate buy down. 

    Hopefully it's clear why a buyer would do this, they want to reduce the cash to close or capital investment. By financing the costs of the transactions buyers or investors can keep their capital requirements closer to the true down payment percentage of their loan terms. In this example instead of being closer to 13-14-15% of $100k, the buyer would likely be at a true 10% down. 

    Why would a seller do this? Because if the property has not sold at or over asking for sometime.. it's probably not going to. Most sellers are somewhat negotiable within reason. If a property priced at $105k has been on the market or maybe had a price reduction already, what's it going to sell for? If the net result is $97k to seller, what do they care how much the buyer is financing? It's their money, let them do what they want with it. 

    There are reasons buyers would not or cannot take this option, For example they could just offer a more aggressive offer, at a lower sales price, but some concessions MUST be seller paid. 

    Some seller concessions may not be in the best interest of the seller..for example if there are multiple equivalent strong or cash offers and do not include a seller concession, apples to apples and net result to seller, I would advise a seller to accept the offer with no concession. Why? Appraisals.

     A property still needs to appraise for the sales price, not the loan amount. So if from our previous example, the property only appraises for $98k, our concession was based on a percentage (3%) of the sales price. Loan amounts are ALWAYS based on the LESSER of the sales price OR appraised value. In the case of a reduced appraisal valuation,  97% of $98k is $95,060 DUE SELLER. So if nothing were to change, the net result to the seller would be the difference between the initial $97K DUE SELLER less $95,060 OR $1,940. Now, there is always room for negotiation. One can potentially reduce the concession, depending on circumstances, but remember our original listing price was $105k, if the appraisal came in low.. it's because that's what the property is likely worth. 

    Seller receives $95k (less RE commissions and seller closing costs) instead of full appraised value (in most markets actual sold at 97% of appraised value would be within reason and common) but ALSO the hard work is done and sellers can access the capital in a few days or weeks. What's the incentive for the seller? Just that. Opportunity cost. 

    Someone wants to buy your asset. Make them a deal and get it sold. I don't understand this apprehension to creative negotiations and buyers and sellers treating any property like the Taj Mahal. You don't hear these wholesalers preaching all over this site preaching about how great the property is (usually the opposite.) They're talking about how great the DEAL IS. Usually not for the seller. 

    This is one way that the seller can help dictate terms. It's almost like, "ZERO DOWN" for a car. A seller concession doesn't always mean the seller receives lower than the asking price. A buyer could offer $108,250 with 3% concession. Or 97% of $108,250, equivalent to $105,002 DUE SELLER. Assuming the property will appraise, to reiterate, it's the buyer's money. 

    We're talking small percentages of the banks money. There are billion dollar deals getting done every day. We're spending days negotiating over fractional transactional costs on your 1978 property listing that has a dozen problems that nobody wants to deal with. SELL IT. Move on. Reinvest. Upgrade. Your seller is already up 300% in 12 years (not including rental income or usage) lol But really.. most negotiations fall apart even before due diligence, if there is a potential problem in the deal, the appraiser, lender, inspector, insurer, brokers or market will point it out and provide clarity on the primary variables during contingency.   

    The point is, concessions provide additional options or middle ground for compromise. Options are good for buyers and a seller willing to offer a healthy concession is likely to have more buyers consider their property as an option.

    Make cents? Then it can make $$$. On larger transactions sellers can also consider excluding commissions on the concession portion. Be sure to discuss all elements with your Realtor. All parties would need to likely agree. 

    Professionally 2/3 of my current closings are utilizing a concession in some form or fashion: 

    - One was a 3% concession towards primarily a 2/1 interest rate buy down. This is a required seller paid concession that typically runs in the 2.125-2.375% range of the sales price. It is not available on all property types but I believe primaries and second homes are eligible. It effectively reduces the buyers payment to 2% below the note rate year 1 and 1% below the note rate year 2. In other words instead of payments based on let's say; 6.75%, for the first twelve payments they are based on 4.75% and the next twelve payments at 5.75%. Year three (if the buyer has not sold or refinanced) the payments would be based at the note rate of 6.75%. To achieve this the lender essentially charges the interest up front, or the total in the difference in interest payment for first twenty four months at closing. They financed this amount (higher loan amount) and any non utilized portion is reduced from the principal balance. The property appraised above the agreed asking price and closes in July. 

    - The second was a 2% concession at closing towards closing costs. At a purchase price of $300k+, this was $6k+ that a first time homebuyer didn't have to come up with. Similar to a car loan, a few dollars a month can go a long way towards making an investment work. Closing costs  this young man can use to installing his dream flooring. The seller received full asking price and a net amount (98%) that was likely above what they would have otherwise received..The owner had a tenant that was moving out. The Property appraised. And it closes the day after the tenant vacates. What is the cost of the owner having the property vacant and on the market a few more months, or longer? Opportunity costs. Closes Tuesday. 

    There are cautions to concessions, in that buyers are still paying 'for it' one way or another. Those few dollars a month add up to a lot in the long run. It's essential to have a GREAT lender that can walk you through options and explain the advantages and costs of each option. 

    Also, concessions can often make an offer less appealing to a seller (mainly because they haven't read this article) BUT also because it's a difficult concept to grasp (the true professionals in the lending community deserve a lot more credit and recognition than they get!) I joke that mortgage pros get all the tough but none of the love. I guess we sort of deserve it (I was a licensed broker for far too many years..mainly from 2004-2011 (I worked with a guy/mentor? that worked very closely with Jordan Belfort..let's just leave it at that..) but when you find a GREAT lender, keep them close! And ask them to better explain the mechanics than I or to provide loan estimates with and without seller paid concessions.  

    Anyway, a seller concession can theoretically make your offer less attractive but with a clear understanding and presentation there is generally a way to account for one or at least a portion without adversely effecting the likelihood of a positive transactional outcome. I have not had a problem getting an executed offer that incorporated a seller concession closed. 

    PRO TIP for stagnate properties or coming to market soon a seller can publicly offer a credit for a property (that is likely to appraise.) In coordination with a pre approved lender, this is one way to drive eyes and foot traffic with an incentive that displays seller consideration. Rates are high (well maybe not historically) but at least on the Oregon Coast, valuations are also heading higher.

    So particularly on higher valued properties where high 6-7%'s can be disincentivizing for investors or for sellers in an area that might be softening, these are useful and meaningful tools to move the needle. 

    Consult with your Realest Realtor and your Leading Lender. DM for references. These are tough concepts that I myself am still mastering, clearly..feel free to proof check or provide alternative perspective(s).  

    Any creative concessions or innovative solutions you've utilized for yourself or buyers or sellers recently? This is a safe space. Share away. Always learning..

    Cheers. 


     Good tips ! 

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.