Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago, 01/04/2022

User Stats

37
Posts
11
Votes
Christophe D.
11
Votes |
37
Posts

Using the Population percent change over the last 10y on Census

Christophe D.
Posted

Hello to all experts.

I am looking for my second deal. And one of my criteria is to select a city with always a positive population % change over the last 10 years.

My strategy is a long-term rental.

Am I right or is it not a good criterion?

For example, I see a house in Canton, OH, with a pretty good Cash on Cash rate. But the city of Canton has -4% of population decrease for the last 10 years. So I think over the long term, I may have problems finding tenants. And the evaluation of the house over the year will be very little.

What do you think?

Thank you.

Loading replies...