Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

4,918
Posts
1,573
Votes
Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Raleigh, NC
1,573
Votes |
4,918
Posts

"Cap on your costs, no cap on your benefit"

Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

I just heard Nancy Pelosi pitch National Healthcare on this phrase, "Cap on your costs, no cap on your benefit."

Holy crap - I don't care what party you are, how can you justify this "logic"? "Benefit" is a pay out - as in the money coming out. The money coming out has to come from somewhere - aka the money coming in. She's saying that you can have infinite dispensing from finite cashflow in. Not only does this goes against the core logic of actuarial science, it's like saying you can continuously pour increasingly more water out of a bucket without putting increasingly more water into it. This is just like Social Security. There's plenty of water in the bucket for the first generation and maybe your kids. After that, good luck.

Hey Nancy....how's that philosophy of infinite payouts from finite supply been working for your home state's budget?

Tim

Loading replies...