Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4,906
Posts
1,569
Votes
Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Viera, FL
1,569
Votes |
4,906
Posts

Ginsburg supports my theory on liberalism and eugenics.

Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Viera, FL
Posted

I need a radio show. I'm getting too good at this.

The day before yesterday I was attacked for making the assertion that the many of the roots of modern liberalism (in both parties - liberalism is not just about Democrats) can be found in early 20th century eugenics. One obvious link is Planned Parenthood - a product of the eugenics movement, founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger.

But just today we have another! A surprising admission by Clinton appointee and liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I'll just quote her here and let you read her words:

"Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae – in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."

So Roe V. Wade, a "victory" for liberals everywhere is about population control. Specifically "populations that we don't want to have too many of." Where have we heard that before? Maybe I should quote the logo of the Second International Eugenics conference, "Eugenics is the self-direction of human evolution." I'm also curious as to who the "we' is that decides what populations we want to "limit"?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103457

Oh Tim....you silly conservative. You don't have any idea of what eugenics or science is about.... You're just an Obama hater who can't think for himself....

Loading replies...