Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago, 08/18/2018

User Stats

13
Posts
4
Votes
Sean McElligott
4
Votes |
13
Posts

Evict and Renovate or keep old tenants and get by?

Sean McElligott
Posted

Would you buy a house where you had to evict a tenant on day one, spend 20,000 on renovations in an effort to make a great return with current market rates? I would have to float the mortgage for 5 months plus renovations but the rents are way under market value. The reason I ask is because in "The Book on Rental Property Investing" by Brandon Turner he writes that it would be a disaster to have that scenario. Is that terrible to take such a loss up front knowing the rewards that lay ahead? Current rents is 925 a month and I can get it up to 2375 after the losses I describe above.

Loading replies...