Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
3
Votes
Bill Fried
3
Votes |
4
Posts

Why do SF Bay investors skip Fairfield/Vacaville for Sacramento?

Bill Fried
Posted

I've been looking around the Sac/Folsom area for singles, duplexes, and quads recently and this time on our way back home to the Bay Area we stopped in Vacaville and Fairfield and found they were both very cute and reasonably priced. What am I missing? Is this not a decent place to invest in real estate that's half as far away as Sac/Folsom?

Thanks.

-Bill

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

738
Posts
1,099
Votes
Wes Blackwell
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Phoenix, AZ
1,099
Votes |
738
Posts
Wes Blackwell
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Phoenix, AZ
Replied

@Bill Fried

Well for one, let's take a look at median home values:

Fairfield: $442k
Vacaville: $442k
Sacramento: $317k

So for an investment property with 25% down and a 5% interest rate, Sacramento is going to be about $670 less per month for PITI ($1,698.96 in Sacramento vs. $2,368.90 in Fairfield / Vacaville).

Yet, according to rent cafe, the average rent is only about $400 more in Fairfield ($1,681) than in Sacramento ($1,289).

Plus, Sacramento has a year-over-year rent growth rate that's triple the national average:

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/621/topics/590913-rent-growth-in-sacramento-is-triple-the-national-average

Further, Solano county has a population just shy of 500,000... while Sacramento county has a population three times that at 1.5 million (add another 375k for Placer county too). Fairfield and Vacaville don't offer enough of a "big city feel" to attract Bay Area millennials. That's why they're moving to Sacramento instead:

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/621/topics/396725-millennial-migration-to-sacramento-2017---here-comes-the-rush

As more and more tech companies allow employees to work from home or commute part time, and more and more start ups head out to Sacramento to save on office space and employee pay, the city will just get better and better.

And while it will take AT LEAST another decade to come to fruition, once the high speed rail project connects Sacramento to San Francisco in under an hour, Sacramento will BLOW UP when tech employees with $150k+ per year salary realize they can cut their housing costs by 50-75% and live like a king in Sacramento... all the while working on the train into the city (or doodling around on Facebook instead of having to focus on the drive and deal with traffic).

https://www.sfcta.org/california-high-speed-rail-project

I know Sacramento better than just about any agent or investor out there (toots own horn), and these are the reasons investors (and residents) are skipping over smaller areas like Vacaville, Fairfield, Tracy, Modesto, Merced, etc. are instead setting their sights on Sacramento.

Loading replies...