Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

292
Posts
34
Votes
Sean Dezoysa
  • Investor
  • Toledo, OH
34
Votes |
292
Posts

Tenant Screening vs Surprise Inspection

Sean Dezoysa
  • Investor
  • Toledo, OH
Posted

In his book "Landlording on Autopilot" Mr. Butler suggests doing a surprise in person inspection of the tenant's current residence. If the tentant doesn't agree the application is immediately rejected. The idea behind this method is that the tenant's current upkeep is the best predictor of his/her upkeep of your property.

Seems highly invasive but also highly effective. Do you guys see this as a strong screening tactic? I've most commonly read here to collect a big deposit not exceeding 2 months rent, use a screening service etc. This method though, I think could do even better. Just my opinion at the moment.

Loading replies...