General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Mariam Arghandewal Safi's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1969121/1621517164-avatar-mariama11.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=168x168@0x0/cover=128x128&v=2)
Garage Door Broke after Crushing Bike
Hello everyone! My name is Mariam. My tenant's son closed the garage door on his bike and broke the garage door. Do I have to bite the bullet and take on the cost or is this the tenant's responsibility?
The tenant thinks the door should have stopped and retracted. I think the sensors which are on each side of the door probably shot through the spokes of the wheel (see picture) which is not a solid object and hence the door didn't retract. The tenants claim "The failed sensor never relayed to the garage door and it kept trying to close itself unlit it stopped. It had so much force to it that it crushed the top of the garage door. I’ve never seen anything like this before." If you look at the attached pictures the bike isn't tilted, doesn't seem to have fallen over. The position of the bike to me indicates that the garage door closed on it and stoped. I doesn't look like it kept trying to close itself until it stoped.If that was the case, the force would have caused the bike to fall over or at least tilt to one side. What do I do? This tenant has been a very problematic tenant. I've always given them the benefit of the doubt but I am just sick of all theses "accidents" which keep costing me money. I'd love to hear any input.
Best
![](https://assets0.biggerpockets.com/uploads/uploaded_images/normal_1606288396-bike.jpg)
![](https://assets0.biggerpockets.com/uploads/uploaded_images/normal_1606288418-Screen_Shot_2020-11-24_at_11.12.18_PM.png)
Most Popular Reply
![Will Fraser's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1002880/1630498851-avatar-willfraser.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=3024x3024@0x305/cover=128x128&v=2)
HI @Mariam Arghandewal Safi, welcome to the forums and I'm sorry to hear about a surely frustrating situation!
In general the "bounce-back" safety features on garage doors is a thing, but I think it would be a far cry to call that a required safety feature in a residential rental property. If the photo safety eyes are working then the primary function of garage safety is being pursued, which is safety to the individual. I haven't seen many holey people running around in garages that those beams can shoot through.
That being the case though doesn't mean much if your tenant is of the disposition that everything you think is wrong and everything they think is right. Also, it's not going to fix the garage door, so to move the ball down the field I would try to have a garage door repair pro (someone who is trustworthy and not unfamiliar with investors) give it a look over, do a safety assessment, and let their take determine who pays for what.
This is something I constantly have to do with plumbing and it puts a little more pressure on the service provider (usually after the fact when the tenant calls them to complain), but it holds the system in the property place -- let the expert determine who dunnit.