Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
3
Votes
Nick Wilkinson
3
Votes |
7
Posts

Buying duplex at 100% LTV! Over-Leveraging or Good Deal?

Nick Wilkinson
Posted

Hello all,


I am currently the owner of 2 duplexes, 1 conversion and 1 side-by-side. The conversion was purchased using a down payment of 20% and cash flows $525/m. The side-by-side was purchased 100% LTV (zero percent down) and cash flows about $400/m. Obviously, this means my cash-on-cash return is infinity but I started with zero equity in the property and have to build it over the long term. The bank was willing to loan me 100% of the property value because my dad has built a very good relationship with them over the last 20 years through his construction business. I recently spoke to the loan officer and he said he would be willing to do this again.

Should I keep taking advantage of the 100% LTV and low-interest rates or is this "over-leveraging" too risky? Any advice would be appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,827
Posts
1,239
Votes
Brian G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,239
Votes |
1,827
Posts
Brian G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

@Nick Wilkinson it's not the LTV that poses the greatest risk in RE, it is a lack of liquidity. By example, if I owned 5 properties at 100%LTV worth $1M but had $1M cash in the bank then my risk is extremely low. This example is an exaggeration to make a point: being well capitalized is more important than your %LTV.

Loading replies...