Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Delin W.
0
Votes |
13
Posts

Owner as Property Manager... LLC for negligence liability?

Delin W.
Posted

Hi all:

I've got two rental properties that I'm about to put into LLCs via Land Trusts. I'm pretty confident this will take care of my concerns about homeowner liability and the "due on sale" clause.

My remaining concern is the risk that negligence carries. Because I am small, I am managing my own properties. I understand this still puts my personal assets in the line of sight for a negligence lawsuit. My personal assets are enough that I want to ensure their protection.

So how do you all handle this? Do you form an LLC for the sole purpose of property management? And do you get the errors and omissions insurance in the name of that LLC? What else? Am I on the right track?

Your experiences and advice are invaluable!
Thanks in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

140
Posts
88
Votes
Keith Barton
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Cleveland, OH
88
Votes |
140
Posts
Keith Barton
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Cleveland, OH
Replied

Bienes & Jon:

Please note Bienes originally said the corporate veil cannot be pierced unless for fraud and misrepresentation (which is 1 part of the test for fraud btw). This is not inconsistent with what Jon is saying.

Assume the following #1:
I own an LLC.
The LLC owns a rental property.
I perform management functions for the LLC and the property.
I, in my capacity of working for the LLC, make a decision or perform an act that is negligent.

Tenant sues me personally for my negligence. Tenant can win and can collect against me. I can lose my personal house and assets, etc.... An LLC does not protect me from this - BUT this has NOTHING to do with piercing the corporate veil. It doesn't need to. I directly was liable for negligence. Because I was directly liable, I am on the hook.

Piercing the corporate veil means something was done improperly and the owner of the business entity should not be given the protection normally afforded to the owners of a business entity. However, in this situation - I was DIRECTLY negligent. No need to pierce anything....

Assume the following #2:
I own an LLC
The LLC owns a rental property.
The LLC employs a manager to manage the property.
The manager performs some negligent act.

Tenant sues me personally. Tenant cannot (should not) win against me. I personally did nothing wrong. Tenant sues manager. Manager was negligent, manager is liable for the negligence and is responsible to the tenant for damages. LLC is liable because the LLC owns and manages the property (or the LLC only manages the property doesn't matter for this scenario). LLC is liable also, LLC responsible to tenant for damages. I personally have no liability. My personal assets are not at risk. I might lose the rental property, but not my personal home.

The only way my personal assets would be at risk in this scenario is if the corporate veil is pierced. THIS is when I have to worry about fraud. Negligence is not enough to pierce the corporate veil normally.

Bienes was talking apples and Jon was talking oranges.

Loading replies...