Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago, 03/04/2019

User Stats

89
Posts
27
Votes
Aaron DiCaprio
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
27
Votes |
89
Posts

Supermodel exploits legal loophole and skips rent for 2 years!

Aaron DiCaprio
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

According to a lawsuit, Ratajkowski and her husband (total net worth of $17M) have been able to live rent-free at their 1,100 square foot apartment because of an obscure New York state law called the Loft Law. Passed in 1982, the law prohibits tenants living illegally in former commercial or factory buildings to be evicted.

Apparently, the intent of the law was to help struggling artists (not uber-wealthy celebs) living in Manhattan studios from getting tossed out for not paying rent.  

Pursuant to this law, if a building doesn't have a residential certificate of occupancy, which would require landlords to bring fire and safety codes current, they can't evict tenants from living there.

The celebs' building doesn't have the required certificate so they can't be evicted.

They owe the landlord $120,000!!!

Unbelievable!!

Does anyone know of any other similar obscure laws?

Loading replies...