Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Angelo R.
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Higher security deposit for more tenants

Angelo R.
Posted

Standard practice seems to be a fixed deposit amount per unit, regardless of the number of tenants. While there are other factors and exceptions, more people generally can cause more damage than fewer people. 

I always see landlords asking for additional “pet deposits,” operating under the notion that pets are potentially more destructive than people  

Applying that logic to a $1000/month rental unit that can accommodate 4 people, would it make sense to set the security deposit to $1000 for 1-2 people, and $2000 for 3-4 people?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,116
Posts
5,172
Votes
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
5,172
Votes |
5,116
Posts
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
Replied

I don’t necessarily agree that more people cause more damage. More wear and tear maybe on things like carpet, but you can’t make security deposit deductions for wear and tear so I’m not sure a larger deposit for more people would be that beneficial. 

The bigger argument against doing what you’re suggesting though, in my opinion, would be that you could run the risk of violating Fair Housing laws. 

Suppose you had two single guys apply to rent your $1000 property. In your example, they’d have to pay $1000 deposit. However, if a married couple with 2 kids applied to rent the same property, they’d have to pay a deposit double that amount because they have 4 people. That would likely be considered discrimination based on familial status. 

Loading replies...