Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

103
Posts
62
Votes
Ted Kaasch
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Omaha, NE
62
Votes |
103
Posts

When Should You Self Manage?

Ted Kaasch
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Omaha, NE
Posted

I hear many clients talk about when the best time is to self manage your properties.  Of course we all know its based on your lifestyle and location of your properties.  My question is assuming that you're buying where you live.  Lots of my investor clients say they self manage their first 4-10 properties then seek a management company.  Then I am also told to start your own management company when you exceed 150 properties.  Whats your thoughts and what have you personally done?

  • Ted Kaasch
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    3,969
    Posts
    2,919
    Votes
    Matt K.
    • Walnut Creek, CA
    2,919
    Votes |
    3,969
    Posts
    Matt K.
    • Walnut Creek, CA
    Replied

    There's really no right or wrong answer....  or really any formula for it other than what's most valuable for you. To me, I don't spend much time self managing my units (3) and I don't mind doing the paperwork/having the conversations when the contract isn't carried out. Maintenance calls etc, I'd rather be in charge of and make sure they're done w/ who and how I want them done... again doesn't take much of my time.

    I went from a managed property, it was OK and if you place a high value on being sheltered from your tenant it could be worth it. It took less time to review the owners statement each mo then it does to collect rents on my own etc and the money (for the most part) just showed up in my account. Emergency or big ticket items did take I'd say equal effort in setting up but it was slightly easier as the PM did the calling/scheduling. 

    If I got to the point where the units I have cost me more in time/money then a PM cost.... i'd make the switch. If I got up to 150 units, I'd probably keep doing whatever it is that allowed me to afford the 150 units and leave the PM to a established high performing PM company.

    WIth that said, not all properties are the same and some take a lot more effort than others. A lot can be cut out by smart screening and good quality assets ....

    Loading replies...