Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago, 08/03/2010

User Stats

171
Posts
24
Votes
David Breitzmann
  • San Francisco, CA
24
Votes |
171
Posts

Landlord will not execute "just cause" eviction - suggestions?

David Breitzmann
  • San Francisco, CA
Posted

Hello friends,

The quick rub is this: Signed a mo. to mo. lease here in SF on 6-15-2010. Rent is very depressed (roommates) at $435 (all inclusive). Beautiful house, backyard with trees and garden. In the Bayview district which is slowly gentrifying (new constructions, professionals moving in, new commercial entities).

We executed a contract which states that if any tenant (there are 3 others - very large house) has more than 3 nuisance disturbances in 90 days they shall be "just cause" for eviction.
[The landlord is the property owner]

As of now; (only one bad apple) roommate has had trespassing guests (entered house through back door at 1am without him being awake); gas stove left on all evening multiple times and general violent/aggressive mannerisms.

She also offered room B (usually $590) for $535, which is a $55 discount. Since this discount was due to the noise disturbance (of the same bad apple) does it matter if it's applied to room A (my current space)? It's within the body of an email (her offer) and unclear how her financial situation is any different if I stay, rather, in room A at the $55 discount.

Filed an Alternative Dispute Resolution motion with the SF rent board. Any other suggestions to move that she perform on her duties to evict (all other tenants have had continuous issues with this apple of which she has been repeatedly informed)?

Loading replies...