Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

484
Posts
276
Votes
David Moore
  • Investor
  • Crystal, MN
276
Votes |
484
Posts

Minneapolis considering Section 8 Discrimination Law

David Moore
  • Investor
  • Crystal, MN
Posted

Just got word that the City Council is considering an ordinance that would make it unlawful or discrimination to exclude section 8 applicants from the application process. I think HUD's own rules should govern this and not city policy. For all Minneapolis investors, perhaps this is an opportunity to contact your council members and let them know if you have an objection to this, and what its impacts will be.

My dislike of section 8 has more to do with the program being so poorly run than the tenants themselves, though from what I've read on BP, there are plenty of bad apples.   I can think of three main reasons this ordinance will backfire, and why they should not do it.

1) HUD's own maximum allowable rent is being easily surpassed by the market. HUD's section 8 tenants are not even at market rate in the cities.

2)  As landlords, we can still require rent to income ratios, without being discriminatory.  I can put in an ad that says you must have 3 times monthly rent minimum income.  Obviously, section 8 rents will not have 3 times monthly rent.  

3) City policy is not consistent with affordable housing.  Where are low income housing units being concentrated?  Uptown?  Southwest?  Downtown?  Nope.  

Loading replies...