Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

187
Posts
61
Votes
Kyle Scofield
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Madison, SD
61
Votes |
187
Posts

The book on rental property investing question?

Kyle Scofield
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Madison, SD
Posted
Okay BP, I've got a question that's just been confusing me a bit lately. In this book, Brandon gives an example of how to calculate total return.. The equation looks like this: Total return = (total profit / total invested capital) / time (in years) His example: ($41,399.08 / $36,950) / 5 years Total return = 22.4% The thing that is confusing me is the profit. So he spent $36k over 5 years to make $41k? Isn't that basically only a $5,000 profit? He made 41k but spent 36k to get there? What am I missing here? Thanks in advance to anyone that replies! - Kyle

Loading replies...