Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 16 years ago,

User Stats

204
Posts
15
Votes
Dave Versch
  • Murray Hill, NJ
15
Votes |
204
Posts

Section 8 tenants issues

Dave Versch
  • Murray Hill, NJ
Posted

Hi. I'm in a situation where I'm about to close on a rental property that has a Section 8 tenant. I just found out that the current owner and the tenant have a side agreement where the tenant pays the owner almost $100 per month more than what Section 8 is aware of. According to the HAP contract with Section 8, the total rent is supposed to be $583 per month, of which the tenant should be paying $130 and Section 8 pays $430. The lease that the tenant signed with the landlord calls for $675 per month. So what's happening in actuality is that although Section 8 is paying their share of $430, the tenant is (knowingly) paying $222, unbeknownst to Section 8. Incidentally, the current property manager employed by the current owner has agreed to stay on, so at least there's continuity...

Opinions anyone? Is this common practice? Should I risk getting involved in this, or should I run as fast and as far away as I can?

Loading replies...