Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

122
Posts
18
Votes
Daniel Miller
  • Fremont, CA
18
Votes |
122
Posts

security-deposit awkwardness

Daniel Miller
  • Fremont, CA
Posted

I know that folks on this forum always recommend (rather strongly) requiring a security deposit along with applications for a rental property.  (This is the deposit for the application, *not* the deposit for actually renting the house!) This is supposedly to reimburse the landlord (that would be me) in the event that he puts alot of work into studying an applicant, only to have them say "Oh, I found something elsewhere, nevermind".

However, this deposit has ended up being very awkward in my case.  Prospective renters cannot even contact me unless they have email, I send out the application by email, and I strongly recommend that application and documents are returned by email... but that makes the deposit handling quite awkward... do I want them to pay postage just for that one document??  (not really) or do I go out of my way to meet them somewhere to pick up that check??

I made the mistake of trying to ask a couple of people who were viewing the house, to give me a deposit check at that time, but that went very awkwardly (which I sort of suspected it would).

My inclination is to just drop the application deposit entirely; if they go through the trouble to fill out the application and scan the documents that I require, I suspect that I can treat that is meaningful interest.  In the meantime, the rest of my research doesn't take all that much time, and doesn't cost me anything at all...

Is anyone here horrified by this idea?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

233
Posts
222
Votes
Bradley Bogdan
  • Investor
  • Eureka, CA
222
Votes |
233
Posts
Bradley Bogdan
  • Investor
  • Eureka, CA
Replied

@Daniel Miller

Just looking over your list of requirements, you can't mandate someone is currently employed in California, assuming that's where your rentals are located. You can set a minimum income, but in many places, including California, you can't discriminate against where that income is coming from (provided its over the table). That means someone on a fixed income, child support, etc. can't be turned down simply because they're not employed. 

Other than that, I'll echo what others have said. Charge folks once you accept their application, and only for the amount it costs you to run the appropriate checks on credit, criminal history, etc. I've found application fees substantially above cost (such as @John Thedford 's $75 per applicant) for anything other than high end properties can be a major turnoff for prospective tenants. 

Loading replies...