Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,516
Posts
1,243
Votes
Nick Rutkowski#3 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Ithaca, NY
1,243
Votes |
1,516
Posts

Sometimes, its easier to work with problem tenants than strong arm them.

Nick Rutkowski#3 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Ithaca, NY
Posted

This happened to me a few months ago. I hope you can learn from my mistakes and experiences. 

 My last eviction taught me its easier to work with a problem tenant getting them out versus forcing them out with their feet dragging. This eviction altogether cost me $20,000 - legal fees, lost rent, and rehabbing. The first month they were late on their rent they explained they couldn't pay and asked for their security deposit in exchange for the keys. That way they could have money to move out to another place. At the time, I was not going to say yes to that and I began the eviction process. In return, they dragged out the whole process and let their family move in without my consent. Because the extra family members weren't on the original eviction, I had to wait another 3 months to get them out. 6 months altogether. Wow right? Well the family members trashed the apartment and left me to clean it up and rehab it. Have to say, not my proudest moment in real estate. But what did I learn? If I just bit the bullet at $1,000 dollars and gave it back to them so they could leave I would have saved $19,000 and 6 months of time. Remember, the goal is to get them out the quickest way possible. Lesson learned. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

42,792
Posts
63,059
Votes
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
63,059
Votes |
42,792
Posts
Jay Hinrichs
#1 All Forums Contributor
  • Lender
  • Lake Oswego OR Summerlin, NV
Replied
Quote from @Caleb Brown:
Quote from @Nick Rutkowski:
Quote from @Caleb Brown:

Do you think they would have left if being paid the $1,000? Seems they are the type to take advantage and not follow the rules

Looking back yes I think I would have been able to work it out with them to move out. At least a lot better than the path I chose to take. I think I let my ego get the best of me and instead of doing a cash for keys I went straight to court.

 Ego will do that lol. Hard part with business is separating your emotions from it. What's important is to learn and move on. Cash for keys is definitely the best way to get people out


 in the day when I was very active at court houses steps cash for keys was by far the best way to get folks to move and bad tenants in a state with bad eviction laws to me would be the preferred method. you simply pay them when they are leaving the house not before.. that works fine and you give them more than 1k .. you make it worth their while.. IE motivate them for money. 

business profile image
JLH Capital Partners

Loading replies...