Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

6
Posts
3
Votes
Zeb Walters
Pro Member
3
Votes |
6
Posts

Creative Solutions to Avoiding Property Registration

Zeb Walters
Pro Member
Posted

Hi BP! I own some properties in a small city in Ohio that is looking to institute an ordinance that would require a landlord to register each property they own within city limits. Along with the registration, the ordinance calls for a registration fee ($35-$100, depending on different criteria) per door. Finally, the ordinance would require all investment properties (each unit) to be inspected every year by a city approved inspector and all expenses would be incurred by the landlord. The reason the city is trying to pass such an ordinance is there are a few landlords that have allowed their properties to deteriorate to the point of becoming severe eye sores and unsafe to live. The Health Department has tried to visit the properties to inspect them, but the tenant/landlord doesn't allow them to enter the premises. I understand where the city is coming from, but I don't agree with the approach. City council has agreed to table the ordinance for now, but is looking for other solutions to this issue. Does anyone have any creative ideas of how a city and local investors can work together to ensure that all properties are safe, habitable and reasonably well-kept without instituting such a harsh, blanketed ordinance meant to keep some of the 'bad apples' in compliance? Has anyone else had any experiences like this?

Any ideas are very much appreciated!

Thanks!

  • Zeb Walters
  • Loading replies...