Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

267
Posts
136
Votes
Eddie Werner
  • Property Manager
  • Pittsburgh, PA
136
Votes |
267
Posts

A different way to look at "retirement" and how to get there

Eddie Werner
  • Property Manager
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Posted

I wanted to look at this topic a little differently then previous posters.  It seems that everyone pushes the 401k save for your "old" self when you hit 62 mindset. This is assuming you want to "work" until you are 62. In my discussions with my financial adviser we worked out the number of needing 2.5 million when I retire to have a monthly income of $5,000. They are ballpark figures but I feel they are critical in this discussion.

If I am working until 62 to retire with 5k a month..........when each property I currently own generates a couple hundred a month in cash flow........isn't the goal then to hit 5k a month in income?  Forget the 401k, employer match, etc. The goal is consistent income each month to "retire". Why not get there early by breaking free of the over marketed and over pushed 401k? I think the key is STRICT money management.

I recently cut my 401k contribution in half so I could save the other 50% of my contribution to buy rentals. The price to rent ratio really favors investors in my market so $250/door cash flow is fairly easy to achieve if you know where/how to invest. I have enough in my 401k if I cashed it out that I could buy 2 properties in cash. Each one would yield $500/month cash flow with no debt service....I would be 20% of the way to my "retirement" monthly income goal. I work and save for 10-15 more years continually saving and investing in properties that by the time I am 40ish (27 now) I have exceed the 5k a month income and can "retire." I feel that active cash flow investing would get individuals to their monthly income goals much quicker then 401k type investing. Has anyone committed fully and done this?  Thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

267
Posts
136
Votes
Eddie Werner
  • Property Manager
  • Pittsburgh, PA
136
Votes |
267
Posts
Eddie Werner
  • Property Manager
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Replied

@Elizabeth Colegrove

My market averages a 30% return on rentals as well so I definitely see the upside to continuing my acquisitions and deploying more capital to ramp up.  My plan is more long term but not as long term as 401k inventors will be waiting to retire. 

Like you mentioned, the key is strict money management.  When I get my paycheck a certain percentage goes IMMEDIATELY into an account for buying my next rental.  If someone doesn't have the self control and financial understanding to do this then they probably should keep using their 401k (or other autopilot-type retirement plan) as a retirement method.  I think for those who understand the end goal is monthly cash flow you can get there a lot quicker and "retire" well before 62.  Thanks for your comment.

Loading replies...