Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Classifieds
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 12 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
0
Votes
Shaunta M.
0
Votes |
11
Posts

PM requiring to be on insurance

Shaunta M.
Posted

Hey everyone, I’m closing on my first property and looking for a PM. The one that I’ve liked so far require that they are put on the home insurance as a co-insured. That seemed odd to me. Especially since in the indemnity they relinquished liabilities to the owner. Is this something that’s common? Or should I keep looking? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6
Posts
4
Votes
John Scribante
  • Minnetonka, MN
4
Votes |
6
Posts
John Scribante
  • Minnetonka, MN
Replied

It is common to be "Additionally Insured" as this saves the landlord money because it is a unified defence, rather than two defense that is paid by the landlord under the indemnity.  Best to find a policy that will provide an "additional insured" listing (not additional interest).  Saves the landlord the double defense cost.

Loading replies...