Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

9
Posts
4
Votes
Christie O'Malley
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Virginia
4
Votes |
9
Posts

Ordinary vs Capital Gains: Calling all Real Estate accountants

Christie O'Malley
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Virginia
Posted

Hi all, 

Lately, I have been trying to do my best to learn the different tax laws and am confused on a few different things. Recently, my accountant told me that if I hold a property for over a year in a LLC that does multiple flips a year, it will still be taxed as ordinary tax and not the capital gains tax. This particular property was land that was being subdivided to sell parcels. Everything I look into says if you hold for over a year you receive the more favorable capital gains tax. Does anyone have a direct link to help me understand if he is correct?


Also, I was advised not to defer taxes from an "opportunity zone" because it would require an S-corp or a partnership. Neither, according to my accountant, is favorable because if you have to move the property out of a corporation it would mean serious tax implications. Also, something about not being able to write off depreciation. He is a very good accountant but everything I read tells me the opposite of what I have been told. If anyone has a link to an IRS page that could help me understand the different implications of rental property in a corporation vs sole-proprietor, I would greatly appreciate it. 


Thank you, 

Christie

Loading replies...