Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . presented by

User Stats

9
Posts
2
Votes
Ivan Vargas
2
Votes |
9
Posts

1st Owner = Individual 2nd Owner = Trust (CA). Problem?

Ivan Vargas
Posted

Property: California

Was a trust recorded incorrectly if it was filed as 2nd owner, leaving the original individual owner as 1st owner?

This is a personal matter where the original owner's new wife is not to be trusted.  Yet, she is the one that had the trust written and recorded.  The original owner is in his late 70's and his memory & cognitive function is on the decline.  She has lied and been very "crafty" with matters in the past and we just don't feel good about how controlling she is.

It's a revocable trust.

When he passes, can it be processed the same as if it were a property with a trust recorded as the only owner?  Or, will this create a problem for the beneficiaries of the trust?

Thank you in advance for your replies.