Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Nancy B.
  • Investor
  • Sewickley, PA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

De Minimus Safe Harbor HVAC Question

Nancy B.
  • Investor
  • Sewickley, PA
Posted

Single family rental property was bought a few years ago for $42,000.

In 2018, furnace and air conditioner were replaced at the same time. They were listed as separate line items.

The air conditioner was about $2700. The furnace was about $2300.

Can I expense the furnace under the de minimus safe harbor election (because it was less than $2500), and then capitalize the air conditioner (because it was more than $2500)?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,982
Posts
1,762
Votes
Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Accountant
  • Atlanta, GA
1,762
Votes |
1,982
Posts
Eamonn McElroy#5 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Accountant
  • Atlanta, GA
Replied

We're in agreement.  Perhaps my wording was poor.  How about this: First we analyze if there is an improvement to the HVAC building system, taking into consideration the B.A.R. tests and treatment under DMSH.  If we find there is an improvement to the HVAC building system in that context that must be capitalized, that improvement is an improvement to the building.

Example: $2,000 for a new furnace.  $3,000 for a new plumbing fixtures and pipe replacements.

Expense the $2,000 for books and taxes under the DMSH.  The $3,000 is capitalized as an improvement to the plumbing system and thus the building (27.5 / 39 year asset under MACRS).

Right?

Take a read through the Treas Reg §1.263(a)-3 and provide your citations if you have something different.

Loading replies...