Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago,

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Is The Tax On Inflation Tax Really A Regressive Tax?

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

Bear With Me...And Please Forgive My Tax Maze Ignorance

My understanding is that the basis of investments is stepped up at the death of individuals who execute transactions in a tax-efficient manner. For instance, taking a loan out (i.e. HELOC) on a property to monetize instead of selling and incurring a capital gain would allow for a stepped-up basis at death and a smaller tax liability. I am sure there are hundreds of other games like this that can be played as well.

So the question is whether or not this sort of tax is really regressive using the following logic:

1. People with money can hire advisors that would likely know about these games
2. People without money cannot
3. It seems logical that this would make the tax regressive past some breakpoint

If the government continues to deflate the currency going forward and the tax on inflation tax becomes more common will we see even more "revenue" transferred to the government coffers from those under said affluence barrier? Is this really a regressive tax?

Loading replies...