Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

29
Posts
5
Votes
Fletcher Caulk
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Fairfax, VA
5
Votes |
29
Posts

Avoiding a 1031 exchange

Fletcher Caulk
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Fairfax, VA
Posted

I bought a townhome with a VA loan in August 2014 and our renters took over in June 2016. We are considering selling this summer, and I am wondering if we can leave the unit empty for two months so we can take credit for living there for 2 years and avoid capital gains taxes. We would not be living there during these two months. Is this legal?

It would cost us about $6k, but that seems worth it to gain flexibility in not having to go through the 1031 constraints. Our equity is about $200k, so we definitely want to avoid a tax bill.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

477
Posts
476
Votes
Brian Schmelzlen
  • Accountant
  • La Mesa, CA
476
Votes |
477
Posts
Brian Schmelzlen
  • Accountant
  • La Mesa, CA
Replied

To qualify for the Section 121 exclusion, it must have been your principal residence for 2 out of the past 5 years.  However, you are not required to live there for 2 years straight.  It can bookend having renters there, as long as you do truly use it as a principal residence.  Keep in mind that you would still be on the hook for any depreciation recapture.

If you do not qualify for the 2 years, you may be entitled to a partial exclusion depending upon the reason you moved.  I would talk to your CPA about if you would qualify.

Keep in mind though that the tax reform bill Congress is currently considering changes the timing requirements to 5 out of the past 8 years rather than 2 out of the past 5 years, so if that bill becomes law you may not qualify for the exclusion anyways.

Loading replies...